Posted:
Why not name these members straight out? Writers deserve to know.
This was the member that plagiarised my story:
Also there should be some sort of rule that members without having posted anything for a certain duration of time will be removed.Seriously I think it's high time Vijay takes this thing a bit more seriously.He made the NOCOPY thing, and then realised that it only extended to as far as the first page and that things could still be copied through the right click button - yet he hasn't done anything about it!There are codes etc which can stop a person from even right-clicking and copying stuff - why not do such things?Sorry to take out my frustration at you, Jot, but honestly this is stretching it a bit too far now.Plagiarising my story, posting it on another website, and then allowing that member to continue to read our stories leaves a terrible taste in my mouth.Mature content and blog links aren't hurting anyone - this stuff actually does.But it's the content and blog links which have such strict rules implemented on them, and hardly anything on plagiarism. IF sure has their priorities sorted, don't they?
comment:
p_commentcount