I think this is just the work of messed up creatives. Wasn't Dharmesh getting married anyway, when Vaishu got married to him? Why did creatives not show anything then? His parents didn't know either. Also, Madhuri says it was her majboori, so why haven't the creatives shown anything about Madhuri's background? And how could Dharmesh hide a child for so long, as the creatives have shown that he loves the child!! What a farce! And why the hell did he want to get married again, if, as we see it now, he doesn't mind spending time with Madhuri? Creatives, please answer.
Why did Sulochana not find out about Dharmesh. She sent her daughter in law to find out where Manav lives and look at the events that happened thereafter. Why did she take a chance with another daughter? Satish was above board, so that marriage is justified.
Yeah and the self-righteous Manav and his pativrata biwi Archana. Nothing more than meddlers of the first order. How can they blame Madhuri? Why did they keep quiet even after finding out that Madhuri had Dharmesh's child? Oh, they were only waiting for Manav to be accused of having relations with his saali? Creatives?
The only person who was right in whatever she was saying so far was, ironically, Dharmesh's mom. To whom Vaishali should have gone first to expose Dharmesh. Sulochana should actually stop all her bhashans. She is very good at them, agreed. But its high time she stopped her hypocrasy!