Originally posted by hermione8
When Ichcha told Veer that Tapasya was telling only half truth, i was wondering Ichcha also did the same, i.e., telling half truth, because she said that 1)Veer was not Tapasya's kid's dad as he was infertile according to the reports and 2)Tapasya was carrying somebody else's child, instead of telling Taps is carrying Rathore's child, especially after Taps herself admitted it was a mistake that happened with Rathore.
Only now I realize that it was a clue the CVs have given there that even Rathore's paternity is disputable and other candidates are waiting in line and that Ichcha has knowingly or unknowingly told the truth only, even though much later and in the wrong time, in the wrong manner, leading to her own misery.
hermoine8, for bundela zoo, only thing that should matter is whether its Veer kid or not, Rathod & Sid are anyways too insignificant to be discussed for this so called story. Iccha had to be kicked out somehow for more drama...π...yes Iccha could have actually kept quiet & let Rathod run the show...but then how will we get to see a devdas Veer...and I'm actually looking forward to it, devdas Veer atleast looks better than this pappu Veer.π
All this is so funny, Veer can just go talk to Dr.Soni & get this clarified easily, he doesnt need a paternity test for this...and why should B house care whose child is it as long as its not Veer's.
Edited by vijayam - 12 years ago