Dwarkadheesh - Bhagwaan Shree Krishna

08/15/2011: Krishna ACCUSED of STEALING Syamantak

Vr15h thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
Krishna is on his chariot headed home while Ramaiya's words ring in him.  Prasenjit recalls what his companions told him, and sees Satrajit asleep.  He sees the syamantaka gem, sees his opportunity and takes it and goes to the woods, laughing and puts it on there and gets on his horse.and starts riding.  Krishna too is headed home.  On the way, Prasenjit sees Krishna and gets scared.  They both come to a halt.
 
Krishna asks him how that gem came into his possession.  Prasenjit claims possession of it on grounds of being his elder brother.  Krishna tells him that it was improper of him to have taken it w/o Satrajit's consent.  Prasenjit tells him that it's a family affair, but Krishna points out that it's a wrongdoing, and it's his duty to prevent that from happening as ruler of Dwarka.  He asks Prasenjit to turn it over to him, but Prasenjit laughs @ him and tells him that he's after it.  Ramaiya arrives and is witnessing this scene. (How convenient!  And what a way to work her into this story!) Krishna tells him that he's being infected by the same sort of behavior that's overcome Satrajit, and now, his warning him about it is going to be unheeded.  Ramaiya at this point leaves, and Krishna asks Daruka to move on.
 
In Dwarka, Balarama is practicing w/ his mace, when Revathy comes in and tells him that Krishna is missing.  Balarama demands to know where he is, and Revathy tells him that Rukmini told her he's in Satrajit's house to warn him.  Balarama is furious that Krishna is still after all this, and decides to go and get him.  Just then, Krishna arrives and Balarama demands to know why he was @ Satrajit's house, telling him that he has to think about his own security b4 that of others, and he doesn't want to talk about any of this b4 the puja.
 
Next morning, Satrajit discovers his jewel missing and beats up his servants.  His wife arrives and tells him that Prasenjit was missing since last night.  He tells his other attendents to join him as he decides to go and hunt down Prasenjit.  Just then, Ramaiya arrives, and tells him that she had overheard Krishna demanding the gem from Prasenjit. (Great idea - Ramaiya gives false witness to implicate Krishna, even though she saw Prasenjit wearing the gem. Incidentally, has this woman forgotten that she still has a son to live for, instead of trying to wage a war on Krishna?) Satrajit vows to slay Krishna and draws his sword, and his wife is shocked.  They all leave, leaving Mrs Satrajit & Ramaiya there.  Outside, others see Satrajit enraged, and he tells them that Krishna had stolen the syamantaka gem.  Everybody is shocked to hear that and decide to go to the palace to confront him, leaving alone Amod (Thomas), who is stunned to hear what he did. (This is too funny - so many fictitious characters - Ramaiya, Amod embedded in this Syamantaka gem story 🤣  Maybe next they'll subject us to a catfight b/w Amod's mom & Ramaiya)
 
In the palace temple, a puja is being performed by Balarama, Revathy, Rukmini & Krishna, but this time to Mahadev, so that he orders Ganesh to forgive them 🤔  The pundit tries to light a diya, but fails to do it.  Then Rukmini tries it, but she too has to struggle to make it light. 😕 Krishna tries to tell Balarama about his encounter w/ Prasenjit, but Balarama tells him not to talk about anything until the puja is over.  He & Revathy pray to Shiva for Krishna to be spared, while Krishna prays to Shiva to give his family the strength they need to withstand everything they are destined to suffer.  Finally, Rukmini manages to light the diya, but after Revathy & Balarama have done the arati, the moment Krishna touches the thali offered to him by Rukmini, the diya goes off 😲 (It's funny to see the concern on others when Krishna is getting battered w/ apshakuns, and Rukmini is failing to light a diya.)
 
Satrajit and his men arrive @ the mandir.  Two guards stop them telling them that nobody can interrupt this puja, but they force their way in.  Satrajit then yells that Krishna is a thief, and Revathy, Balarama, Rukmini & Krishna all turn to look @ him.

Created

Last reply

Replies

9

Views

2005

Users

6

Likes

33

Frequent Posters

aalochak thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
Thanks Vrish...excellent update as usual 👏

This really was a weirdly convoluted and grating episode - sorry if people feel otherwise.
I hate that Krishna was accused so quickly at mere heresy - In the original, Krishna is accused once a search party finds Prasenjit killed in the jungle, and the Syamantak gem missing from his possession - Satrajit of course had given him the gem to use during a hunting expedition. So after finding his brother dead and the gem missing, and knowing Krishna interest in it (for King Ugrasen, albeit), Satrajit falsely concludes that Krishna murdered his bro to take the gem

Now, what is being portrayed is utterly disjointed. Noone knows who took the gem or where Prasenjit is, but they accuse Krishna.  

Uppers 😛😛😛
⭐️Loving Hemant Chauhan  and Vishal's acting (despite the poor screenplay)
⭐️Outdoor scenes, and SFX looked good

Downers
😕A mousy meek Priya Bhatija eating up most of the words in her lines (perhaps all these Upvaas and anushtaans is making her too hungry)
😕Hated the screenplay
😕Hated all this superstition prattle, and apshakun obsession (Krishna seems so helplessly caught up in all this mumbo-jumbo ... am actually missing the Krishna of the initial episodes that would turn to the cameras and lecture us on Dharma and Karma)

Completely Nuts🤪🤪🤪
🤢All the fictional characters popping into the story. Aamod and Ramaiya. Utterly unnecessary.
🤢Krishna asking Prasenjit for the gem so that he may return it to Satrajit !!!!!! Didn't they spend the last 2 episodes making Krishna trying to take away the gem from Satrajit. 
🤢 Rukmini telling Panditji to please ask Shivji to soften the curse on " Krishna ji" 😲 OMG she finally said his name !!! 


Edited by aalochak - 12 years ago
chemestry thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
why they r now showing that boy n her mom again .their story should be finish n not to show again

why r connecting fictious character with the original story of Satrajit

i liked te episode today but why cts r connecting this track with all superstitions like deeya not lighting, curse of that ramayia.

instead of joining all artificial charcter with original character they should have start with only original concept but not to do something artificial story start their next original story.

DBSK will completes its its 4th part
kalyan, rukimin haran, devki part and now satrajit
😊 let see what will be next
chemestry thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
today i specially love the krishna in his cariot scene where he was leaving  to his dwarka after covo with that ramyia
👏
aalochak thumbnail
Anniversary 16 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
Sorry for posting this here but the topic for the 12-08-2011  episode is closed.

DIDNT ANYONE NOTICE THE MAJOR BLOOPER😆

Krishna looked as the chaturthi ka chaand and incurred the curse. However the moon that was shown was actually a full moon and resembled nothing of a 4th phase of the moon🤣
Either the scriptwriters were high again or ...
Of course Chandra-dev forgot to wane above Dwarka because he went to meet Vasudev and Devki with the other Chandravanshi peeps in Mathura. Or perhaps he was too afraid to wane knwong the temperamental accusations of the Dwarkavasis like Aamod and Ramaiya. 
Vr15h thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
aalochak
 
That's what I thought - in this serial, they've liberally vilified not just Krishna's enemies, but also people even partly cold towards him.  That's how I remember it - Prasenjit didn't steal the gem, but was allowed to take it by Satrajit.  Also, after it went missing, Satrajit did suspect Krishna, but never openly charged him w/ theft.  After it was recovered and Krishna clarified everything w/ Satrajit, the latter was apologetic, but beyond suspecting Krishna, Satrajit wasn't guilty of even an iota of the stuff he's depicted as doing here.
 
I thought Rukmini's role here was pathetic - her worrying excessively about apshakuns, despite her husband being Krishna!  Such concerns would be more appropriate of a Mandodari, or a Gandhari.  But even beyond that, I found it really wierd that when a Ganesh Puja didn't work, they did a Shiva Puja to trump the shortcomings of the Ganesh Puja.  The way I understand it, when one does a puja, they do it assuming that the deity they're worshipping is the final arbiter of their fortune: if they have to go up a hierarchy, then what's the good of worshipping the lesser gods in the first place?  Are the Sagars that ignorant about the importance of such rituals?
 
The guards were supine - when Satrajit tried to force his way thru, they'd have been justified in spearing him.  If they can't prevent a mob from entering the temple or a palace, what good are they? 🤔  Why would Balarama or Krishna even bother keeping them, since they're perfectly capable of protecting themselves and their wives?
 
P.S. When Revathy came into Balarama's gym, she didn't address him by name, or as Dau, just said suniye...  Maybe she can teach Rukmini those ancient norms 😆
Edited by _Vrish_ - 12 years ago
skarriramsai thumbnail
Group Promotion 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
This content was originally posted by: _Vrish_

aalochak
I thought Rukmini's role here was pathetic - her worrying excessively about apshakuns, despite her husband being Krishna!  Such concerns would be more appropriate of a Mandodari, or a Gandhari. 

 



Can call me shan, i know my un: skarriramsai is a bit wierd😉

Rukmini is just shown again and again as a wife concerned about her husband .  I dunno what logic CV's have behind this.

But, even if the creatives are giving such similar scenes it is the onus of the actress to make it look as though the anxiety is growing instead of just being flat right from start. For instance, when she is tying the flowers with her being preoccupied in the morning 2 episodes ago, she should not have shown so much anxiety in her expressions. They were supposed to be toned down. With anxiety getting upped during the puja when the curtain falls down and krishna seeing the moon. And, in today's episode, finally, she should have shown the same anxiety as she showed two episodes ago.  This would not have made things look repetitive. This is the value addition that talented actors do.  Anyways we are talking about talent and can't expect more from her at this juncture😡 Alas, actresses are more concerned about costume and most of the time their concerns end with costumes🤢
This content was originally posted by: _Vrish_


But even beyond that, I found it really wierd that when a Ganesh Puja didn't work, they did a Shiva Puja to trump the shortcomings of the Ganesh Puja.  The way I understand it, when one does a puja, they do it assuming that the deity they're worshipping is the final arbiter of their fortune: if they have to go up a hierarchy, then what's the good of worshipping the lesser gods in the first place?  Are the Sagars that ignorant about the importance of such rituals?

mnx12 thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 0 Thumbnail Anniversary 13 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 12 years ago
Thanks for the update, this epi gives impression, that life in Dwapar yuga, was like sas-bahu tv soaps shown in Kaliyuga😆 When they have SB, an authentic source for showing Krishna's story, then why not show it in it's original form instead of adding some twists in form of Ramya etc. What is the use of showing Ramya's curse, now she herself is instrumental in a sort of taking revenge. King of  Dwarka is shown, like anyone can come & accuse him without evidence, their tounge is mightier then Krishna's sword😆 They should mention the source for the track in the title credit.😊
varaali thumbnail
Anniversary 17 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
>> Rukmini telling Panditji to please ask Shivji to soften the curse on " Krishna ji" 😲 OMG she finally said his name !!! >>>


And, pray, why couldn't she (or Revathi, for that matter) refer to her husband as "Aryaputra?"- that was the official and acceptable term used by wives to refer to their husbands.

>>P.S. When Revathy came into Balarama's gym, she didn't address him by name, or as Dau, just said suniye...  Maybe she can teach Rukmini those ancient norms 😆>>

Maybe we can teach the scriptwriters these ancient norms.😛



Edited by varaali - 12 years ago
skarriramsai thumbnail
Group Promotion 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
This content was originally posted by: mnx12

Thanks for the update, this epi gives impression, that life in Dwapar yuga, was like sas-bahu tv soaps shown in Kaliyuga😆



Yeah, have u noticed rukmini's curls of hair on either side? This actress seems to assume that she is acting in some 1970's Hindi picture whre she ahs to strut around in some fancy costume.  Oh God is she really blessed to play Rukmini? Or are we cursed to watch her?🤣

 When they have SB, an authentic source for showing Krishna's story, then why not show it in it's original form instead of adding some twists in form of Ramya etc. What is the use of showing Ramya's curse, now she herself is instrumental in a sort of taking revenge.

This is called creative freedom, I guess😉

They should mention the source for the track in the title credit.😊[/QUOTE]

Source is CV's very own fertile imagination😈