Originally posted by: -ASTHA-
If i'm not wrong veer is father of child. I dont find anything wrong if she is impressing veer.
Originally posted by: varun.tap
I thought u are in dilemma 😳no problem I tell u, rathore is the father of that son and tapasya is the mother of same son and ichcha is the third person in between father - mother who misfiring on father means on rathore and on their veer who is no one in between them...😆
very well said!!!!!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ @bold part astah i want 2 add one thing here- its not wrong if wife tries 2 impress husbnad if she was/is accepted by husband not just physically but also mentally, psychologically & spiritually!!!!😆 bcoz sum ppl've the prob of short term memory loss!!and they'd applied this logic wen taps wa strying 2 impress veer or rtaher seducing by dancing on bahon ke darmayan etc.!!!😆😆Originally posted by: -ASTHA-
Just stop thinking about me and use some logic. Ichha is mother of son and veer is father and rest are aaya and servent to look after baby. In mukta's case all tapasya lover shouting that ichha is not mother she is only aya so same applies to tapasya.And in ur cooment u clearly mentioned that ichha is trying to impress father of baby. And fact is that veer is biological father of child. I dont think its wrong if wife tries to impress husband.Tapasya has habit to act as third person between husband and wife not ichha. Please dont blame ichha if rathod is impress with her. As its hard for normal people to survive with tapasya.@bold: Thanks for clarifying that rathod is father of son and tapasya is mother of same son as there is no guarantee and warranted for tapasya. Its her habit to change father of her child. Purani adat he kisi aur ka bacha kisi aur pe thopne ki.
Originally posted by: nikkieI agree guys, it was a wonderful moment in UT amidst all the crap they are showing.
Wonderful enough that I made a siggie dedicated to it...
I hope you guys will like it
comment:
p_commentcount