I don't know if this topic is a debatable topic, but it was going through my mind for a long time, so I wanted to say it.
"Artists are very emotional"
I have heard this phrase/dialogue/line/whatever so many times, that I wonder sometimes that if it is even true or has it just become a simple phrase?
The reason, I think it has little meaning. How an artist can be sadder than a person who lost all his business in fraud or happier than a person who's both wife and child survived, or than a father who found his son alive after four day search under the school building's rubble.
It is true that artist (including, actors, painters, poets, writers, etc) that they have emotions, but when they come on TV and say that artists are close to nature, near to God, they can express their sadness and happiness in a better way. They can portray common man's feelings better then the common man.
I object!! How can they do that? Why do they say that the abstract art they make shows the conflicts of a human being or of the world? How can a poet tell a story of a beggar in his poems, when he himself is sitting in his air conditioned room?
Jaab tak experience na kiya ho, you can never understand the true feelings.
What Artists make, write, act, portray is their imagination, it is not emotions. Emotions are based on reality, and imagination is fiction.
comment:
p_commentcount