hmm thanksThis content was originally posted by: jnawazPlease see the post on Pg 1 for additional help regarding grievances with the DT
JAZ
Members getting attacked directly and indirectly could be make out from the posts , from the two lines too, we might not intend to do it so.
Oh yeah I would like to add one more thing I'm in no one group because I hardly come here to be part of any group. πHaving group and all sounds like kiddish where we use to behave when we were kids. Just because people raise voice against things happening with someone shouldn't make them to be part of some group.
Edit: I will like to add one more thing you people constantly making threads and closing when proper debate is also going is surely not fair. It is like stopping someone from raising voice even last time you guys did same and now also. Let it be open and see what are members saying. Also you guys close it then some other mod comes open it, defend her stand and again close which is not done!
This content was originally posted by: koolsadhu1000I will tell you . They clearly made comments ...that we don't feel like going to EDT thread . We feel 'uncomfortable' there . Mind you , This is TWICE that I have read these comments and let them go without taking them personally as i regularly post on EDT thread .
Their comfort zone it seems is ONLY on Brief Update thread . Ok fine ...I let that go . Their choice . What saddened me was he comment on how EDT thread was making them uncomfortable yada yada . Could not these members have simply said We Want the brief update thread ? Why these ADDITIONAL comments ? Now WHO was making negative taunts ?Still I did NOT report .Yes, I was one of those who said it and very openly so.But I don't get it how does it becomes personal or a negative taunt to you or any other member who posts in EDT? π I merely stated a fact, that is very true...not many people feel like posting in EDT, not because of you or any other member but simply cause the flavour of discussions there is a whole alot different there, as not many people like to discuss this show with so much intensity and not many take it so seriously, not that discussing it seriously is wrong or something but then not many people see the picture similarly, and that is why they feel uncomfortable to put foward there views in that thread cause the discussions there are much more serious than what some people would like it to be, again I'll say there is nothing wrong in that, its just the case of two extremely different set of views, just like no one from EDT likes to post in Brief update thread, for the very same reason cause their views don't fit very well in that thread and they don't feel comfortable to post them there isn't that the case even for people who post in EDT? Thats what all my comment meant...now how does it qualifies as a negative enough comment or becomes a taunt to you or any other member in EDT to be reported or to be taken personally is out of my wits! π
This content was originally posted by: suanHi Jia,
Tried "liking" your second post, but the "like" button wasn't working.I agree with all that you said in both posts. Re the second post, what you said about some people not feeling comfortable with the intensity of discussions in the EDT, is precisely the case with me.I was fed up with PR even when Sushant was still there, but kept watching the show in the hope the CV's would buck up and improve the show. All to no avail. So when Sushant left, I stopped watching, because for me, Sushant and Ankita are Arman and PR. Without either, the show does not hold much interest for me.When the CV's did a 180 degree with Archana's character, in order to get the public to accept Hiten as Manav quickly, and to have viewers dislike Archana as much as possible to help them like Hiten as Manav quickly, that made it even more difficult for me to deal with the show.I know the CV's did all this to accomodate the leap. There had to be conflict between Archana and Manav for the separation to take place before the leap. Many members laughed at the terrible job the CV's did re the leap...passports, visas etc being obtained in one day, etc.Since the 4 year leap, PR has not been the PR i got to know and love in the beginning. It is in a terrible state now, and that's one of the reasons why I'm so happy with the short updates, because it was becoming too stressful to read all the terrible details in the long update.I'm one of those who is very happy the trp's are down and I hope they continue to fall drastically, so that if Ekta doesn't end the show soon, ZEE will be forced to end it. The current PR, which is really PR 2, is not the real and relatable original PR. I have no connection to the current version of the show.I'm not the type to be very forceful and strident when expressing views, except when I'm personally attacked and abused, as I was by Prasad and Saksham on numerous occasions in the past.To date, I have not seen any public response from any of the mods, indicating to these two members that what they did was wrong, why and where they were wrong, and to give them any warning. I'm not surprised that these two members attacked me in the manner they did, having read in Prasad's post that they are related (cousins). It is a shame indeed.The very strident way views are expressed in the EDT is why I don't post much there. The tone of discussions there is too negative for me, in that only negative things about Archana, Sulochana and Purvi are discussed. Other characters are given a blye, excuses are made for their mistakes, whilst for characters mentioned above, no chances are given. I like to be fair and unbiased. I deal with all characaters in the same way. When they do wrong, I say so. When they do right, I say so. This goes for all characters.Recently, I asked Kools a question about a part of her post, because I didn't understand how she came to the conclusion she had. Before she came online, Varsha and Bnalla were kind enough to bring me up to date and I then understood why she said what she said.On another occasion. Kools responded to sections of one of my posts which was in reply to one of Bhalla's posts. I replied to Kools and she responded once more. At the end of these exchanges, I was able to understand where Kools was coming from. Though I still did not agree with her views, I understood her, and mentioned to her that I enjoyed the debate with her. I said then, and I still say, that is what this forum should be about. Members exchanging thoughts in a mature manner, even when they don't agree.When one member asks another to clarify something, that does not mean the member is being asked to justify themself or that the member asking the question is reading between the lines. Questions are asked in order to clarify uncertainties so that misunderstandings don't occur.So everyone, please try to understand where someone is coming from before getting upset. All these things will help us have a peaceful and happy forum.
@green ... resham had warned u guys ... that dont blame any actor for other character's butchering ... still u doing thatThis content was originally posted by: suanHi Jia,
Tried "liking" your second post, but the "like" button wasn't working.I agree with all that you said in both posts. Re the second post, what you said about some people not feeling comfortable with the intensity of discussions in the EDT, is precisely the case with me.I was fed up with PR even when Sushant was still there, but kept watching the show in the hope the CV's would buck up and improve the show. All to no avail. So when Sushant left, I stopped watching, because for me, Sushant and Ankita are Arman and PR. Without either, the show does not hold much interest for me.When the CV's did a 180 degree with Archana's character, in order to get the public to accept Hiten as Manav quickly, and to have viewers dislike Archana as much as possible to help them like Hiten as Manav quickly, that made it even more difficult for me to deal with the show.I know the CV's did all this to accomodate the leap. There had to be conflict between Archana and Manav for the separation to take place before the leap. Many members laughed at the terrible job the CV's did re the leap...passports, visas etc being obtained in one day, etc.Since the 4 year leap, PR has not been the PR i got to know and love in the beginning. It is in a terrible state now, and that's one of the reasons why I'm so happy with the short updates, because it was becoming too stressful to read all the terrible details in the long update.I'm one of those who is very happy the trp's are down and I hope they continue to fall drastically, so that if Ekta doesn't end the show soon, ZEE will be forced to end it. The current PR, which is really PR 2, is not the real and relatable original PR. I have no connection to the current version of the show.I'm not the type to be very forceful and strident when expressing views, except when I'm personally attacked and abused, as I was by Prasad and Saksham on numerous occasions in the past.To date, I have not seen any public response from any of the mods, indicating to these two members that what they did was wrong, why and where they were wrong, and to give them any warning. I'm not surprised that these two members attacked me in the manner they did, having read in Prasad's post that they are related (cousins). It is a shame indeed.The very strident way views are expressed in the EDT is why I don't post much there. The tone of discussions there is too negative for me, in that only negative things about Archana, Sulochana and Purvi are discussed. Other characters are given a blye, excuses are made for their mistakes, whilst for characters mentioned above, no chances are given. I like to be fair and unbiased. I deal with all characaters in the same way. When they do wrong, I say so. When they do right, I say so. This goes for all characters.Recently, I asked Kools a question about a part of her post, because I didn't understand how she came to the conclusion she had. Before she came online, Varsha and Bnalla were kind enough to bring me up to date and I then understood why she said what she said.On another occasion. Kools responded to sections of one of my posts which was in reply to one of Bhalla's posts. I replied to Kools and she responded once more. At the end of these exchanges, I was able to understand where Kools was coming from. Though I still did not agree with her views, I understood her, and mentioned to her that I enjoyed the debate with her. I said then, and I still say, that is what this forum should be about. Members exchanging thoughts in a mature manner, even when they don't agree.When one member asks another to clarify something, that does not mean the member is being asked to justify themself or that the member asking the question is reading between the lines. Questions are asked in order to clarify uncertainties so that misunderstandings don't occur.So everyone, please try to understand where someone is coming from before getting upset. All these things will help us have a peaceful and happy forum.
comment:
p_commentcount