It was a 5 min case but took 2 full episode..
Questions KD should have asked.
- Did sharad (son) see her lighting Avni.
- Did FIL, BIL, SIL or Servent see her lighting Avni.
- Did any one see her lighting Avni.
- Is there finger print or any other evidence that prove Saas started the fire.
Answer for everything is no. Till you have an eye witness or any other evidence, police is just speculating. She could be prime suspect based on circumstances (fight between them, sharad's accusation and ghaslate order etc) but she can't be charged based on what prosecution had. It is prosecutor's responsibility to prove that she did the crime and there is no doubt about it but prosecution doesn't have any witness or evidence. Police and prodecution doesn't have any case here.
I am not a lawyer or a law student but it's a 5 min defence for me. Here we are showing one of the best defence lawyer is defending her and he is not asking any of these questions. Why the hell they show KD always finding the real criminal. It is police's responsibility. His responsibility is just to nullify any evidence prosecution is bringing forward.
comment:
p_commentcount