Why not Rahul Gandhi, why Modi? - Page 4

Originally posted by: -Wanderer-

I admit that even I was disappointed a bit when AK quit as PM.

However, look at the facts. BJP had the highest number of votes. They should have stepped in there. There was this huge pressure on AAP after the unexpected poll-result. They should not have stepped in in the first place. When they did, they were cornered with them not being the absolute majority in terms of votes and seats and the Congress obviously not giving their support. Then there was this intense scrutiny to see them falter.

Would you please elaborate a little bit on the issue in West Bengal and what you mean so I can reply to you properly?

@Bold: I have zero respect for Ambani. If he is lending support to a party then it will definitely not be in public interest but motivated by personal gain. He is the model of arrogance living in the antilla which is the most expensive residence in the world. That too in a city which houses one of the largest slums. If he were interested in public welfare he would have donated money to charity like Bill gates. I think AK is right about Ambani there.

As for AK banking on Muslim votes, its an assumption people are drawing automatically from the fact that he is challenging Modi.

Originally posted by: -Wanderer-

I know!

Even me! 

While a general candidate does not get a medical seat, a candidate with reservation having the same mark more or less gets one of the top colleges. Its horrible and you feel so helpless.

My cousin brother studies in engineering college. There apart from reservation during admissions, even for getting jobs there is reservation(after getting same opportunity!) Then there is reservation for promotion. It is so hopeless!

Originally posted by: mannu_minnie

i can't stand any other newspaper except Indian express and The Hindu. TOI, HT and TT are rubbish. too much advertisement plus bad editorial.

Let's wait and see wat happen. Right now people are sick of staleness provided by congress. If modi gets diverted from this route, next election he will get his due. 

Originally posted by: -Wanderer-

😆

They have utilized this 50 percent limit very well. Look at the number of candidates from backward castes and the number getting admitted.  Already we compete with less seats and then there is this huge reservation!

You see students who are really well-off and getting same opportunities as you claiming reservation and getting seats inspite of being less capable.'

Even 50 per cent is too much.

Originally posted by: stewie_griffin

if you can understand just see the cartoons of hindu, hindu cleverly potrays without any bias about whats actually happening. Yes but you need brains to understand the actual meaning 😊

Originally posted by: stewie_griffin

West Bengal cm is mamta banerjee who supported congress but withdrew support as she was not getting funds from center and since then west bengal is just stagnating at best. Many bangladeshis, muslims in particular are being free loaded in india into delhi (another cause for rapes) and other places. Congress even plans to give them voting rights before election you know why. 

From west bengal's example I wanted to say that without money development is not possible and modi's model of development is to make the one capable of ruling,the rulers and others workers. 

What aap says that everyone should be ruler which is practically impossible and certainly a model which will fail.

On muslim vote bank, you didnt see from where has aap won.It was from sc and muslim areas.He personally had met the head of jama masjid. I'am not saying bjp doesnt indulge in vote bank politics but then if you also do it then dont play the blame game on others.

Aap never had any intentions of doing anything in delhi to start with but even after giving them the benefit of doubt they did prove they never wanted to do anything  

Originally posted by: -Wanderer-

Apart from lack of support from central government, progress in West Bengal is also slow due to a mad and incompetent CM. She hardly does anything constructive. The TMC party is made of a lot of hooligans. So is the opposition party in WB.

I agree that financial area can't be ignored but the means matter right? Ambani is sure to have made some demand in exchange for this support. 

Actually, AAP had a lot of support from middle-class educated sector. Uneducated people are led on by false promises but many people in Delhi with stable jobs had come in and lent support to AAP. You can't govern well without having a proper support. AAP did not have majority votes. They should not have stepped in and when they did they were cornered by opponent parties.