Nakula & Sahdeva are BOTH sons of Madri. Yudi said that he wanted to be fair to both Kunti & Madri, and THAT is why he chose Nakula to be revived at the end of Yaksha prashna. In that case,
whose son was Sahdeva? Wasn't Sahdeva Madri's son as well?
I know the yaksha asked for ONLY one brother to be revived, but if it is
just a question of "fairness" towards both Kunti & Madri, then why Nakula
over Sahdeva?
Or was it the case of Sahdeva being Kunti's "maa ka laadla", so Yudi felt that Sahdeva had a closer connect to Kunti rather than Madri, and therefore, Nakula becomes the "Madrinandan" in THIS scenario?