Hey guys,
I know u guys probably don't know me as I am not a regular in this section but i just love the debates that go on here and have been a silent reader for quite a while.
Coming back to the topic, My topic of debate is that is depending on 'Saboot's' to solve a case always necessary? I mean to say that we all know that the court of justice, also known as the 'adalat', is fully dependent on proofs or witnesses. So is this right? I mean the proofs can be planted on the site or the witnesses can be bought with money anytime so how is this justice then?
Do you think that relying on proofs is not the best thing? I know that I don't a real experience in this stuff and this is probably coming from the movies but its not wrong is it? This stuff does happen in the real world too in every continent, country, city or village.
I mean we all are here sitting safe in our houses at this moment (*touchwood* i must say) but there are so many ladies who will be raped or people who will be murdered in the lonliness of the streets where no one could hear them but who will have the proof of the rape or that murder? The case will be automatically suspended coz of lack of proof or even if there is one, it can be manupilated by threats or money so then how is this justice?
Do you think the system of justice needs to be changed a bit? I know this is not possible but then the system today is not perfect, is it?
Then what is being done or what can be done to ensure that there is perfect justice in such cases because the people with power, authority or money can get away with anything but what can be done to ensure that the regular middle class or lower middle class people get justice that they have been striving for in such a case?
Naina
comment:
p_commentcount