Originally posted by Super.Psycho_
i know people think this because she made it like that from the beginning...but she didn't cleared harry/hermione's relationship at all...so if u judge thinking there was "no ron" in the story then u will realise how much harry and hermione were for eachother... okay...even if i accept this still pairing harry up with ginny doesn't make sense...she has no important role in the whole story..+ she killed too many characters unnecessarily ...what was the need of killing sirius ?...okay then she killed fred ? ...but crossed her limit by killing hedwig and dobby ...she killed luna who could have been better than ginny...or even cho...i think what im saying make sense
It's subjective, you know. There are fans of all kinds of pairings. I personally am all for canon. Harry and Ginny may not have been a very romantic couple, but I honestly don't care because for me, Harry Potter was not about romance. The themes of the epic were completely different, like war, abuse, etc. She did not have time for romance so she did not focus too much on developing the relationships of each character, which is OK. If one wants to read a romance story, Harry Potter is not the one. It deals with much more complex themes.
People have their own opinion, and JKR wrote what she wanted at the time. We don't have to agree with her, but it's her story so we don't really have the right to say what she should or shouldn't have done. Besides, for me Harry and Hermione are such a boring couple. There's nothing interesting about their relationship. Had they been together, it would have been so cliche with the hero and heroine getting together like in every other story. Ron complements Hermione in a way that Harry never can. That's just my opinion.
Btw, neither Luna nor Cho died. Cho is even more random than Ginny for Harry, and Luna would have been OK, but I'm more a fan of Luna-Neville than Luna-Harry. Luna and Neville would have been so cute.
Edited by ..RamKiJanaki.. - 9 years ago