Will Unfair

The whole will is so unfair to the kids. Yes, Ankita deserves money but so does every other person in the family. They say that she sacrficied for Pari happiness. That is such b.s. They act like she didnt have choices. Pari, Manav, Archana asked her so many times whether it was Naren baby and whether it was a contract marriage and she said no. She had everybody supporting yet she chose to sacrifice. SHE COULD HAVE KEPT THE BABY EVEN WITH NAREN NOT LIKING HER. All the other kids deserve some of that share just as much as she does. Ankita chose to make those decisions she wasnt forced into it.         












Edited by nikki1591 - 9 years ago

I think it happens in real life too.  Those, who can't help themselves, usually get more than those who can.  Ankita's main thing from the very beginning was to take care of her siblings.  That was the main reason why she married Naren in the beginning.





Edited by tvaddict3 - 9 years ago

I felt bad for Sachin also. He has always been Manav's right hand man. He didn't deserve the entire inheritance but he didnt have to work for it now either. He has done A LOT of good for Arman and the family until recently under the influence of his wife. Still, even with her, he tried to maintain neutrality. I just think you can't negate his entire life's hard work based on this behavior.

Anyways, why is Ankita even getting everything right now? Right now, her taya (sachin) and both Bhuas ( teju & ovi ) and even her own father (soham) are alive and well. Shouldn't they get it in pieces since they are the direct children (also thru sacchin senior) and then they give to the grandkids.

Anyways, i don't understand how PVR works anymore.

Ankita has gotten everything for the sake of the story. Otherwise, in my honest opinion, they all deserve shares.

Ok I agree with the last poster, its the keep the story going and clearly they are trying to tell you that to get justice you need some money backing you. Clearly Ankita couldn't win the case without money behind her name and now it just happens that she gets it this way. 

 Manav said that he was entrusting Ankita with the property bcos she would be fair to everyone as she has proved it over time that she thinks about others more than herself, is honest and values relationships over material benefits. So I think that rather than putting the entire inheritance on her name and not giving a dime to others or disinheriting them from the property, it's more like a guardianship sort of thing, where he has entrusted Ankita with the property to manage it, like it was the case in joint families earlier where the guardianship of the property went to the eldest son by default and he took care of it and the benefits were reaped by the family as a whole, at the end of the day it was considered FAMILY property not property of any one person. All the sons got their share of money, and in case the property was divided later, they got their equal share as well.

Sachin was really not a good choice for being in this authority/guardianship position bcos everyone in the family knew he was under his wife's influence who had been eyeing for the property for a long time now and had even been committing scams. No matter how hard he has worked in the company, if making him the guardian meant that the rights of other children could come to harm, it was best not to do it.  I think Teju should have been made the guardian since she has worked in the company for many years, is elder, more experienced, and a good balance of emotions and practicality, and most importantly she was devoted to her parents and the family till the end, unlike Sachin who couldn't be any less concerned about his father to die and his wife was plotting to get the whole of it on her name. Even Ovi would have been a better choice.

Anyhow we all know that the main objective of the will in the story is to put Ankita in a position where Ankita answers back to those who were able to ruin her life and buy their way out through money, logic has never been present in PR anyway. Maybe, later on, we might get a flashback scene or a scene where Manav reveals that he had understood Pari's lies and Rushali's game and this was his way to give Ankita a stronger position, or something like that.
Edited by nikitagmc - 9 years ago

I agree. I actually felt pretty bad for the other kids.

Sachin never worked for Manav's company until Manav gave him chance but Sachin failed.

The only thing I couldn't understand is I guess Ankita made her decisions herself. If she wd hv chosen to stay with Archana her baby would probably have been with her. She risked her baby's life by travelling alone to unknown plAce that too state of UP where crime against women are one of the highest. In real life I don't think any family will adopt a pregnant girl without asking much questions and without any background checking. Still may b she was lucky but still it her stupidest decision as she risked her baby life. She could have easily travelled to canada or abroad as manav has. House there n stayed peacefully. Now she can accept the property and help so tht time too she cd hv accepted help when she needed most.

Secondly, now manav ignore de everyone. I wonder y sohum isn't in jail for killing gauri. Still manav is happy to accept him. I guess the charector or ovi suffered a lot too. It's not easy for a girl to live alone without contacting family n raise a kid. She did it and I don't think Arjun supported her. May she doesn't want the money but still manav shud have atleast called her n asked.

When it comes to Arjun's property, cvs showed him a very successful business man after leap with a big house and lots of awards. I wonder where it went. Pari n pigs shud have enherited the property but no mention of it.i guess he was shown super rich but his money disappeared. Again they have shown naren highly qualified and intelligent, how he can't find a job in Mumbai after getting so many international business man of the year awards. Even a normal MBA guy can earn a decent amount to afford a flat. Same goes for pari Shirish n all. CVs r highly confused. They just don't know any company law as in PR selling n buying companies are so simple with just a phone call.

Now coming back to topic I feel it is a biased decision. Even if ir kids have done wrong they need a chance to explain n redeem. Giving one person everything when u have like 9-10 grad kids 4-5 kids n all it bad. Imagine everyone asking for money from Ankita it is bad.

Teju would have been best choice imo if it was just to manage for the time being. She is the eldest of the Deshmukh house after her brothers who have lost that privilege.

How is 3rd generation kids handling and managing their fam bussiness when 2nd generation kids are still there? Just doesn't make sense to me.